throwaway12345t
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
It seems to be priced the same and if it’s being hosted somewhere vs run locally it’s still a worse model, the only advantage would be it is not Anthropic or OpenAI.
Then I ask Opus to take a pass and clean up to match codebase specs and it’s usually sufficient. Most of what I do now is detailed briefs for Codex, which is…fine.
The real test in any system is scaling usage across many different use cases and users.
But you did your job, it’s driving clicks and views, pushing the narrative that you don’t need x vertical, you just need cursor.
What software do you think shouldn’t be rebuilt and replaced with cursor?
Because if it’s all cursor, at some point you have eaten all your customers.
just quietly move that back to a CMS so you can get back to building more interesting things, nobody actually wants to maintain a CMS
the chance of the software that does one thing well being maintained by the dedicated company is higher than the chance of Lee not switching jobs once the once vesting cliff has been reached again
We spend ~$120/month on our CMS which hosts hundreds of people across different spaces.
Nobody manages it, it just works.
That’s why people build software so you don’t need someone like Lee to burn a weekend to build an extremely brittle proprietary system that may or may not actually work for the 3 people that use it.
Engineers love to build software, marketers working for gen ai companies love to point to a sector and say “just use us instead!”, just shuffling monthly spend bills around.
But after you hand roll your brittle thing that never gets updates but for some reason uses NextJS and it’s exploited by the nth bug and the marketer that built it is on to the next company suddenly the cheap managed service starts looking pretty good.
Anyway, it’s just marketing from both sides, embarrassing how easily people get one-shot by ads like this.
I imagine they exist in an AWS or GCP rack somewhere, too bad