thex86
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
"Americans Are as Likely to Be Killed by Their Own Furniture as by Terrorism"
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/06/ame...
You should ask yourself why the police should not be allowed to do this. And then if you do understand, you may perhaps realize why the GCHQ should not be allowed to carry out mass surveillance.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
There is a reason that democracies around the world don't allow police to just randomly walk into your house and arrest you. A good reason.
Just because terrorism has to be prevented, doesn't mean that our basic rights have to be violated. By that logic, let's go even further and install CCTV cameras and microphones in everyone's homes. All crimes can be prevented. And perhaps the next step can be to have thought control devices even.
Are my fears unfound? On one hand, the idea of buying drugs online is probably more safe than doing it on the streets, but the anonymity this offers has a potential downside like the one I mentioned above.
(People within these companies are also hackers, but they have more effect when they speak because they are part of a company)