thegreatkahuna

Yes, that is correct

I agree that in perfect world I could have done this exercise with competent engineers and a UX desginer. I know about software development processes and applied that to e.g. testing and hardening, but it is not a substitute for deep technical knowledge. THe idea behind having a separate agent create the tests is to that then the coding agent couldn't get functionality to work or fix bugs by weakening the test. I believe Bob Martin has talked about this. Noted about the architecture document - will have to ensure it is as solid as possible. I already run the full CI pipeline that we run for our app + the new ones that the agents developed - would it be good to have additional regression tests?

Thanks for the link! You could very well be right that there is not much more that could be done before the review. My reading of what Kelsey said is that agents can produce useful outcomes, it is just that humans need to validate and own them. In other words, I couldn't conclude that this somehow disproves that at least some of the functionalities that were generated in my project, couldn't be (close to) production-grade.

I suppose you are right at least what comes to the functionality. Security is the one thing where I am sure that my company will require some peaking under the hood.

I hear you. This must have been a long time ago, like last year or something. Those were the times.