thefastlane
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
I agree wholeheartedly. even nonprofits, etc., tend to be helmed by folks that think purely in terms of financial statements, etc.
in their eyes, you are nothing more than a line item on a spreadsheet. everyone above you on an orgchart effectively has the power to have you ousted. you, of course, have no such reciprocal power over them.
one key takeaway from this observation: don't live paycheck to paycheck -- it's tempting to buy nice stuff with all this money you're suddenly earning... but don't do it. get serious about your finances now. first priority is to save up buffer funds (six months minimum). don't let their power to fire you turn into the power to seriously wreck your life. be proactive in taking care of yourself, you family, and your career.
and as has been said elsewhere, plan to make a jump to a new firm every 2 to 4 years or so, that's the best way to build up your earning potential.
do i sound cynical? hope for the best but plan for the worst.
But you create a false dichotomy between books no one checks ou' and books with useful and relevant information. if a book doesn't get checked out for, say, a year, is that an indication that it contains no useful information? on what basis?
i'd go further and say this is not a case of flawed metrics but flawed ideology. i don't want my tax dollars to fund the book-equivalent of redbox. i want my tax dollars to fund the preservation and archiving and availability of knowledge, regardless of how 'popular' an algorithm says it is.
granted, a library cannot hold infinite books. but i'd take the curation of a librarian over an algorithm any day of the week.
it is the employer's responsibility to provide you with basic things like a computer, a chair, a desk, etc.
also, this 'startup' is not in good shape if they can't provide you with the tools you need to do your work. it sounds like a sinking ship, and you should simultaneously be preparing your exit strategy asap.
but any title progression beyond that depends on getting good at navigating the politics of your work environment. you won't get far without people skills. banks actually do a good job of mapping out what this looks like for analysts coming in, in terms of leadership skills etc expected for different titles. technical organizations, however, tend to leave their staff in the dark about this sort of thing -- which is a political move in itself, i suppose.
i think it would look pretty strange on a resume. if you have a compsci degree, you should already know how to write software, which is what a bootcamp would teach you.
i don't know the details of your resume/career thus far, but you might want to think about how to present your career such that there are no gaps. point is, HR types need to whittle down very large stacks of resumes, and 'gaps' are an easy way to do that.
keep applying and going to meetups, and working on your programming skills. it isn't easy, but you'll snag a job eventually!