theemathas
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
This youtuber got a fraudulent DMCA notice, and his counter-notice got automatically rejected. The person who sent the notice isn't associated with the devs, and is asking for a $100 ransom to get the channel reinstated. How could this be fixed?
Proof that the person sending the notice isn't "authorized on behalf of the copyright holder": https://twitter.com/Lionheart/status/1671349063931838464
Tweet about the automatic rejection of the counter-notice: https://twitter.com/Azrial_Vanity/status/1671696220190810113
Tweet about the initial DMCA takedown: https://twitter.com/Azrial_Vanity/status/1671323777978736643
Mention of the $100 ransom: https://twitter.com/Azrial_Vanity/status/1671332970836140032
Any youtube people on here can help? Or anyone else have any advice?
Proof that the person sending the notice isn't "authorized on behalf of the copyright holder": https://twitter.com/Lionheart/status/1671349063931838464
Tweet about the automatic rejection of the counter-notice: https://twitter.com/Azrial_Vanity/status/1671696220190810113
Tweet about the initial DMCA takedown: https://twitter.com/Azrial_Vanity/status/1671323777978736643
Mention of the $100 ransom: https://twitter.com/Azrial_Vanity/status/1671332970836140032
Any youtube people on here can help?
Early Bing AI had a tendency to be rather unhinged.
Imagine a ball being thrown up and then falling down, in a parabola. Reversing a video of that still gives you a video of a ball in a normal parabola trajectory.
This is false. In some sense, there exist numbers that can't be referred to. We can refer to the set of real numbers as a whole, but not some of the elements. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definable_real_number
But then there are issues with defining "definable numbers", which complicates things by a lot. https://mathoverflow.net/questions/44102/is-the-analysis-as-...