thanhhaimai

Opinions are my own.

One of the positive effects of the recent AI wave is that it shows more folks are warming up to the idea of paying a subscription for tech. Perhaps, the next generation will grow up with tech that doesn't rely on addiction to earn ads money. The downside is that the gap between "folks who can afford tech" and "folks who cannot" might grow even more.

I'm not the OP, but I think everyone might have a different definition of what "audible inner monologue" mean.

For example, I don't talk to myself in "monologue". But I can close my eyes or stare at the screen and visualize the solutions. The words that I usually tell myself during that are "what?", "why?", "strange!", "really",... not a monologue or sentences.

In 1970, a single minimum wage income can raise a family and save up for extra.

In 2026, a single minimum wage income can barely survive by themselves with no saving in most part of the US.

From the article:

> Antigravity was the only autonomous agent that implemented the Pantheon’s signature interior ceiling pattern: repeated square coffers visible through the oculus.

The article also includes a video showing the patterns visible through the roof oculus.

Opinions are my own.

I think the biggest winner of this might be Google. Virtually all the frontier AI labs use TPU. The only one that doesn't use TPU is OpenAI due to the exclusive deal with Microsoft. Given the newly launched Gen 8 TPU this month, it's likely OpenAI will contemplate using TPU too.

Opinions are my own.

For agentic work, both Gemini 3.1 and Opus 4.6 passed the bar for me. I do prefer Opus because my SIs are tuned for that, and I don't want to rewrite them.

But ChatGPT models don't pass the bar. It seems to be trained to be conversational and role-playing. It "acts" like an agent, but it fails to keep the context to really complete the task. It's a bit tiring to always have to double check its work / results.

I don't understand the use case. What would this provides that Airplane Mode doesn't?