tennien
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
1. Wouldn’t a 30min commute be 1/3 as worse there’s a 20-25min section you can disengage?
2. It can force reengagement via the same mechanism for L2 highway driving, but there is a period where one need not pay attention. There are also existing car lots on the sides of highways for maintenance, and they could be added and expanded. At worst, the shoulder provides space for hundreds of cars per km.
3. greifers are a problem for any self-driving system
7. The remote drivers need engage only in exceptional circumstances, as the driver would.
9-11. apply to existing geofences, but with far more added complication, including pedestrians and cyclists.
Accidents still happen, but it’s hard to believe they would be less safe than human drivers, when most accidents are caused by fatigue, reckless driving, illegal maneuvers, and unusual driving on the part of the operator. It’s even harder to believe that it wouldn’t become safer with effort, when both the road and the behavior of cars is far more predictable.
Apple has made it profitable only for mobile games. Since 2015, 99% of large successful companies have started on web.
The news behind the news is how somebody helped Durr win.