Recent submissions

Comment · 8 months ago
Spectacular! I'm morbidly fascinated by the variance in how well different streets have been plowed.
Comment · 8 months ago
Does this remind anyone of pranking the new hire? "Go to the hardware store and fetch some rainbow paint"
Comment · 8 months ago
This is fascinating! Did the attempts start as soon as you started up the server, or did it take a little while to get going?
Comment · 8 months ago
There's no TLD for the latter.
Comment · 9 months ago
This is wild. Not sure if it's more of a reason not to use ClawdBot, or not to get into crypto.
Comment · 9 months ago
I went to install "moltbot" yesterday, and the binary was still "clawdbot" after installation. Wonder if they'll use Moltbot to manage the rename to OpenClaw.
Comment · 9 months ago
Sad to see no mention of Manchester airport in this. Seems like they flag every third bag for manual screening.
Comment · 9 months ago
A lot of this felt very familiar. Having multiple plans does seem like a good way to hedge against the unknown, but I can also see that you'd end up with the "secret 5th" plan when all of those unknowns eventually stack up.

Planning is inaccurate, frustrating, and sadly necessary.

Comment · 9 months ago
I got a classic and obvious 419 scam email today. Kind of felt like I'd gone back to a simpler time.
Comment · 9 months ago
I really don't know how I feel about that Ctrl/Control joke.
Comment · 10 months ago
I'd see this as coming down to incentive. If you can scrape naively and it's cheap, what's the benefit to you in doing something more efficient for git forge? How many other edge cases are there where you could potentially save a little compute/bandwidth, but need to implement a whole other set of logic?

Unfortunately, this kind of scraping seems to inconvenience the host way more than the scraper.

Another tangent: there probably are better behaved scrapers, we just don't notice them as much.

Comment · 10 months ago
Given they've been essentially subsidizing self-hosted orgs for a while, I'm kinda surprised they didn't do this before now. Probably wanted to lead with the price cut for everyone else.

It'll be interesting to see how this affects third party companies providing GitHub runners.

Comment · 10 months ago
Interesting approach! I can see promise in the vet tooling assuming the module keeps up with GitHub's schema well.

If you had to pick, what's the "killer" feature for you with this module?

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton