teddarific
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
Oh that sounds very neat — definitely similar in nature! Documents and UI are both complex and can require a lot of iterations to get right
Also, our customers tell us that anecdotally it feels like we error less compared to other tools because we are focused entirely on frontend (there’s less room for error). Of course, we still error a lot - not easy when natural language is your input set!! - but it helps to stay focused and theres less dependencies on a backend & database.
p.s. one of my personal favorite parts of Magic Patterns is that you can very easily revert to a previous version, which is possible because no backend or database!
to add on to Alex's answer above, we also differ in that we have a lot of features focused around brainstorming / exploring ideas, versus just spinning up a fullstack app. For example, we have a "Commands" feature that lets you get four variations (that are guaranteed to be different!) of a prompt.
We also have a Chrome extension that lets you import designs from your existing product to ideate on top of existing content.
3 was a lot harder than expected — a great exercise for anyone honestly. I'm a math nerd so this was cool visualized!
Would love a web version that's easily usable though; as much as I live in the terminal, just too much of a mental burden installing a new package.
I honestly find the real debate to be inline styles vs stylesheets.
Tailwind is just fancy inline styles. Personally, every single time I've used stylesheets in a large production-grade project it's an absolute mess. Every project I start now I use inline styles. I'm pretty indifferent on Tailwind though, it's sometimes nice to get opinionated defaults.
would love to hear what you think when you give it another try!