technocrat8080

Wow, would love to see a source for this.

Have they ever talked about their size or weights?

5.4 Mini's OSWorld score is a pleasant surprise. When SOTA scores were still ~30-40 models were too slow and inaccurate for realtime computer use agents (rip Operator/Agent). Curious if anyone's been using these in production.

You can provide the screencapture cli as a tool to Claude and it will take screenshots (of specific windows) to verify things visually.

In my experience, especially with Opus 4.6, using subagents greatly mitigates the startup context hit. 4.6 has very obviously been RL'ed on subagent usage and it almost always spins up an Explore agent to get a feel of the codebase and get a token-efficient summary. The 1M context version of 4.6 further alleviates this.

My original question was more along the lines of implementing things like PR review yourself. I was tinkering with an internal service that spins up ephemeral CC instances to analyze PRs, but realized this can easily generalize across arbitrary tasks. Was curious what sort of things folks could use that for.

To be clear, it's not a TEE replacement but does address one of the most common use cases of TEEs

Seems pretty obvious Sky.app's functionality will land in the macOS ChatGPT app at some point. I wonder how Atlas fits into that story.

Sky is macOS only. It essentially gives an LLM access to various system APIs coupled with a floating user interface that you can access on command.

By parallel, do you mean editing the codebase in parallel? Does it use some kind of mechanism to prevent collisions (e.g. work trees)?

What kind of agents do you have setup?

Curious about this too – does it use the standard context management tools that ship with Claude Code? At 200K context size (or 1M for the beta version), I'm really interested in the techniques used to run it for 30 hours.

A bit confused, all this to say you folks use standard containerization?

I sense the undertone here is that there's a cost to genetic testing – did I get that right? Could you expand on that philosophy?

My god, how can I take photos like that? Do you describe your setup and process somewhere?