techn00

Effect looks so cool, but the only thing that is off-putting (for me) is the DI. I don't even mind the syntax.

I just don't like these DI systems that pull stuff "out of thin air" auto-magically instead of just passing arguments.

I can't see how this is different from a fine tuned LFM2.5 encoder

When do you spend time with your spouse lol

average python script writer

I thought that OP linked this devbox since so many subcommands from the cli are almost identical

Hi, author here

I wasn't aware of this library, I did check for name collisions with other Go repos though

Hey, author here

You're not forced to use that comment, you can pass the event however you like, if you satisfy the event.Any interface (by having the method EventName() string).

I prefer that comment because Go doesn't have native sum types, and I believe that by using the framework in combination with the gochecksumtype linter, you get the best developer experience and type safety (you DO have tab autocomplete with the events for recordThat - the type system helps because of the sealed interface).

But again, if you don't want to use the linter, no problem. You can create constructors for the events however you like, just like in your example.

I am so sick of AI generated README's, they follow the samn damn format.

This story is similar to the guys at senja.io: tech founder => marketing/growth person joins => business skyrockets to 1M ARR. It looks to me like a combination of having a product with some revenue and havingthe luck of someone like Jon joining.

I'd be more interested on how to find people like Jon tbh.

Biotech, wearables

"We were gonna ask 1399 euros for this (overpriced already) but we think that some people might want to give us more money if we market it as an experiment"