tastroder

chrome://on-device-internals reports "Model Name: v3Nano Version: 2025.06.30.1229 Folder size: 4,072.13 MiB" on a random Windows machine I just checked.

SSRN is a preprint server and that is the only published version.

I clicked on a few red team "scenarios" if you want to call them that, a few of the tiles look like output of regular tools vaguely related to each but the rest - including the main "terminal" thing - seems more on the fictional side to the point I don't see this being educational.

There's plenty of training material out there these days actually using these tools in contained but realistic environments, if education is the goal just go for those.

How are you tackling users that don't read AI generated output before posting it somewhere?

> Would he have not disclosed it if they offered hush money? We won’t know, for his case I hope not. In any case - what was he expecting?

A bog-standard responsible disclosure that any tech CEO should either be familiar with or have someone at hand that is, as is clearly communicated in that e-mail.

Both e-mails are OP reaching out to help this company out, the first fixing the vulnerability, the second giving them a chance for compliance / potential regulatory aspects they might want to follow. It's not on random people reporting security vulnerabilities to tutor random companies on this and both behaviors (non-responsiveness, then hostility) of this CEO, despite being sadly common, are actively harmful if you want to get productive security reports in the future. (And the company unilaterally signing up for bug bounty programs is rather irrelevant for independent researchers as well if they have no interest in participating in those.)

This is exclusively other people's content that's badly credited (if at all) to push Amazon affiliate links.

Nothing, the whole repo and that post are spam intended to drive people to that e-book repository linked in the readme (which in turn is just a bunch of fake updates and likely engagement as well).