Recent submissions

Comment · 8 months ago
it's back today, even I'm verified on https://chatgpt.com/cyber, fortunately I can notice pretty quickly when it happens now - difference is apparent
Comment · 8 months ago
Hi, i'm on codex pro plan and it silently routes to 5.2 today, WTF? Anyone else gets similar behaviour? I was working with it since morning (UTC) and afternoon sudenly it became much slower and got very different feeling, so I started digging and enabled codex logs and got:

2026-02-12T20:41:12.751950Z TRACE codex_api::sse::responses: SSE event: {"type":"response.completed","response":{"id":"resp_0fc56e20d02a6b5701698e3ae51fac8191a5bae8fc9962662c","object":"response","created_at":1770928869,"status":"completed","background":false,"completed_at":1770928872,"error":null,"frequency_penalty":0.0,"incomplete_details":null,"instructions":"...personality.\n...","max_output_tokens":null,"max_tool_calls":null,"model":"gpt-5.2-2025-12-11","

Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
I don't have a reason to not believe them in that regard, there was a spike, but it was not visible in analytics I have access to it seems.
Comment · 3 years ago
If anyone interested here’s what happened https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34696763 I was not aware about the spike in bandwidth, will also try to handle such cases on my side better.
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34642984 I wasn't breaking the ToS at least not 2.8 (non html content) - my point was that I can understand I'm heavy user of the Workers and built-in pricing may not be economically feasible for CF to serve me hence push to Enterprise plan - I get it, just wish it was communicated to me clearly and beforehand my site went down.
Comment · 3 years ago
Small in a sense it's only me running it and relatively low customers number (~400). So in that sense small applies?
Comment · 3 years ago
I don't know anything more just yet, just that my account was unbanned.
Comment · 3 years ago
I'm also a massive fan of Cloudflare in general, love their Workers and related products, just that one aspect of account suspension without warning could be improved a little bit :)
Comment · 3 years ago
I'd be happy to provide more info but I have none. First I communicated with support which told me that my account was restricted most likely due to 2.8 clause violation (non html content) and suggested to contact with sales which I immediately did.

Sales over the phone (was fastest) told me that it's good I contacted as otherwise in 24hours my account would be fully banned(whatever it means) and that they will prepare me an offer in 15 minutes, but it was taking longer (no response after an hour or so) and in the meanwhile I wrote Twitter and HN post which CTO of Cloudflare noticed and then after a while I've got another phone call from sales that I should update my ticket to ask unbanning my account as it was approved now by CTO which I did and that solved the issue at least for now - and that's it - no further info what the issue was, still waiting on Enterprise plan quote for me.

Comment · 3 years ago
Cloudflare is not used at all for data collection (it's not scraping, it's using official exchanges APIs), only for the APIs that serve historical data.
Comment · 3 years ago
sorry, I did HN post in desperate move so my service can be online again - did not try to blame anything on @jgrahamc - other than that incident I'm very happy with Cloudflare Workers, it's an awesome tech.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton