talos

Hmm I'm curious which blog post tripped it? I tried a few from your site in 2023 and none of them were flagged as AI generated.

Did this not read as AI generated to you?

Yeah, it's got a real issue with false positives. And I've tried a bunch of other tools (Sapling, ZeroGPT, a few others) and actually GPTZero was the best of the bunch. The others would miss obviously AI generated content that I'd just generated to test them.

I've had a blog post kicking around about this for a while, it's CRAZY how much more expensive AI detection is than AI generation.

In my mind content generated today with AI "tells" like the above and a general zero-calorie-feel that also trip an AI detector are very likely AI generated.

It's also full of head scratchers like this:

> Technology costs do decrease. However, demand always migrates to the newest, most powerful models.

> People do not:

> Choose GPT-3.5 because it is cheap.

> Select a lower-tier Claude model on purpose.

People definitely can, and do, both things for many workloads. Coding is an obvious exception, but oftentimes a cheaper model is good enough. And businesses that had to spend $5/MTok on a frontier model last year can probably get similar performance and spend $0.50/MTok or less today.

AI generated content. Shame they couldn't bother to have a human spend time on this, it's a fair point.

Yeah it reads like it, and if a random AI detector (GPTZero) is to be believed it's pretty much all AI generated.

Crazy that nobody can be bothered to get rid of the obvious AI-isms "This isn't just for...", "The Challenges (And How We Handle Them)", "One PR. One review. One merge. Everything ships together." It's an immediate signal that whoever wrote this DGAF.

The Information article can be found on archive.is.

Both the OP article and this Times of India article appear to be AI-generated summaries of the original article.

Craziness!

Twelve years and running!

I don't think OP's idea would work, but if it did you could just ask for a translation.