talklittle
Joined 17 years ago
Joined 17 years ago
Neat idea, but wouldn't this still be exposed to ISP-level attacks? Since the user is still loading the page initially in plain HTTP, so the ISP could still inject code, remove the JS redirect, etc.
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/digitalocean/investo...
> There is no formal definition on what constitutes a "surgical stainless steel", so product manufacturers and distributors apply the term to refer to any grade of corrosion resistant steel.
Also if you look at the dev branch [2], they have been making sweeping changes to the codebase; most recently it appears they have been removing "old" JavaScript libraries like Bower, presumably to move everything to an NPM setup.
If my impression was correct, then Firefox Send supports different use cases than IPFS.
Presumably Basecamp has set up business entities abroad.
https://travel.stackexchange.com/questions/2272/about-differ...
However its full potential is not ready yet, since Firefox has been migrating to WebExtensions, and this has not fully stabilized yet. Long term I think the WebExtensions move also makes sense, since it gives extension authors a stable API to work with, instead of XUL which can break with each Firefox update. And the architecture makes it easier to optimize threading performance and some form of security sandboxing.
So the point is, I think more UI experimentation is on Firefox's horizon, but they have to first stabilize the technical architecture before they can go full throttle on that.
I mean, how could CloudFlare, or anyone, possibly differentiate this from normal scraping/polling/ manual F5 refresh behavior? This sounds like a PhD thesis.
I guess you are asking CloudFlare to quantify the amount of distinct bytes of unauthorized data sent to any particular user agent? But then, any sophisticated attacker would rotate IPs, UA identifiers, and probably even between vulnerable websites, if they had known about this vulnerability.
I don't think it's reasonably possible to rule this out, even with a massive dedication of investigative resources. Like the other commenter said, it's wisest to assume it happened.
The current administration is businesspeople. They know $130k sounds too high, it's anchoring for negotiations. It'll go lower.
But also it's kind of the point of the reform being pushed, right? If somehow $130k is passed, it will obviously disqualify most foreign workers from acquiring these visas, and maybe the current quota of visas wouldn't be met. Then the quota may be lowered in the future, further limiting the visa program.