syjer
Joined 16 years ago
Karma
254
Submissions
84
Member since
Oct 20
Recent submissions
Comment · 3 years ago
I think it's this one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35114009
Comment · 5 years ago
From my experience, enterprise apps are generally complex because they are a combination of:
- environment: integration of a large amount of services - and a good amount of them are legacy and idiosyncratic
- use case: enterprise app are at the intersection of real life and the virtual world: the rules are messy, illogical and have a baggage of 20/30+ years. Thus they cannot be changed at all. This is IMO the main difference between a "pure" greenfield startup kind of project and the enterprise one.
- add another layer of burocracy and complex environment to navigate
And with that you got the enterprise app world :).
In the end whatever framework is chosen, the most important property is the availability of common language/patterns.
Comment · 5 years ago
You may notice that in the linked article, only the artifact id has been spoofed. In maven you need to declare both groupId and artifactId for your dependency (and a fixed version, a range is generally considered a bad practice).
To be noted, it makes this kind of attack more difficult, but not impossibile.
Especially the mix public/private artifacts. I guess it will force a lot of companies to at least lock their groupId on maven central, if they never bothered to do so.
Comment · 6 years ago
The trick is setting the right redirect_uri [0].
Generally it's implemented with a custom URI scheme (that the target application is registered for) or a loopback ip address.
[0] https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/nati...
Comment · 6 years ago
Yes you can upload: https://support.google.com/youtubemusic/answer/9716522?hl=en .
The UI/UX of youtube music is lacking compared to GPM, but at least the file locker functionality that I use is still here.
Comment · 6 years ago
And create an accessibility nightmare.
Comment · 7 years ago
Hi, one of the devs here. I would like to clarify that this project has been developed as a side-project, it's not (at least, during that timeframe) our main work.
So don't take the time to develop a feature as a 100% full time work :)
Comment · 7 years ago
Hi,
You are right about angular. We already have done 50% of the work, as we have the "customer" facing part done in angular 8 (https://github.com/alfio-event/alf.io-public-frontend).
In the next release (M3) we will convert the "admin" part too (we are targeting a new frontend built with angular material) :)
Comment · 7 years ago
If you consider that window, normally use third party drivers (by amd, intel, nvidia) which bundle by default vulkan.
Linux distributions and the more recent android versions?
Comment · 7 years ago
>The absence of a package manager like Bundler or Cargo was frustrating
why you did not use maven or gradle?
Comment · 7 years ago
I think that the approach done in https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/loom/Main is better than the async/await infrastructure.
Comment · 8 years ago
There is a subset with spring-fu (https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-fu). They are working to support the native-image feature of graalvm (https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-fu/issues/29).
Comment · 10 years ago
our little project support ldap for the login part: http://lavagna.io/ .
Comment · 11 years ago
Oracle Java is based on OpenJDK and certified by Oracle. So I don't see how pouring vast resources into OpenJDK would make "Oracle Java" obsolete.