swirlycheetah
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
It feels like you'd need to have a wide breadth of knowledge of multiple projects to be able to submit a worthwhile pull requests each day for 24 days.
It'd be interesting to hear from people who did complete the challenge though.
Generally my contributions to other projects have been similar to the OPs, they've come naturally as I've hit stumbling blocks in third party libraries.
The sensitive information issue is certainly a valid concern and something I'd be worried about personally too when streaming. I'm not sure how we'd solve this in the long term, initially though it'd probably just be down to streamer education.
Watching quill18 fix a bug and be visibly excited about his code working (raising his hands and shouting something along the lines of 'fuck yeahhhh') during the last Ludum Dare was such a warming experience which mimicked the internal monologue I often have when a piece of code finally works as I expected it too.
There's obviously a demand for people who want to watch coding steams, my biggest challenge is ensuring there are people who can offer streams worth watching.
I feel most of those issues you mentioned can either be solved with technological solutions (pause, rewind, ffwd a stream) or with streamer education and practice (talking through your thought process, increasing font sizes).
I do, however, have lots more to research and understand before I can be confident there are solutions to all the problems currently faced.
I think in terms of a devv.tv MVP it'll probably be video embed to begin with though.
The general gist I'm getting is that people often feel insecure about streaming their coding sessions due to perhaps not feeling confident in their skills, workflow, tools or various other issues.
I'm planning on chatting to some established streamers to understand their process and analyse what's currently missing which I could help them with. I then need to chat to some programmers who have never streamed before to understand what stops them from doing so and if anything can be done about that.
If you've got any thoughts or feedback they'd be much appreciated.
Their software is open sourced and easy for anyone with a server and some technical knowledge to get up and running. They offer a paid for hosted product which is reasonably priced and offers automated updates.
Here's[0] a report on their progress in 2014, as you can see their model is working very well for their product.
[0] http://blog.ghost.org/2014-report/