svieira

Joined 16 years ago

Karma
1,878
Submissions
856
Member since
Aug 24
Outline of the man: * Catholic, Virginian.

Outline of the programmer: * Python, JavaScript, Scala, C#, Java.

Ad Jesum per Mariam

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 2 days ago
Now the real question is "is the revert rate the same because you still have the same process, or do you fix-forward more often now, so your revert-rate is because of higher-severity incidents?"
Comment · 3 days ago
> a good choice

For who?

Comment · 11 days ago
Comment · 12 days ago
> Along with desperately loving entertainment, they desperately want companionship.

And I am presuming that the companionship that people need is the companionship of other human beings. Otherwise, tamagotchi, fish, cats, dogs, parrots, and horses are already perfectly good companions. AI can help fill in for some of those other ones (tamagotchi especially), but it cannot replace human companionship.

Comment · 12 days ago
> People will have more artificial friends than human friends within ~20-30 years.

That would be awful, presuming that the artificial friends are not people.

Separately, you might like Count to the Eschaton by John Wright with its ultimate project being "the sophistication of all matter".

Comment · 13 days ago
I recently re-read Venus, Inc. and the number of times that the satire didn't hit because it read too close to our current reality was quite depressing.
Comment · 19 days ago
> don't allow

Is this "allow" or "encourage"? If "allow", how do you do that deterministically or at least fail-closed?

Comment · 20 days ago
In the vein of these 2 minutes of Guy Steele's talk on Fortress (How to think about parallel programming: Not! https://youtu.be/dPK6t7echuA?si=huyI3LR8LVaB6Yen&t=1589) I think that the real thing here is "do not hide what is important nor obscure that which ought to belong to the user". The question is (as always) "what is important"?

And I think that the "tool" vs. "automation" delineation is one of the clearest and most succinct takes on _how to talk about this problem_ that I have seen in the past few years.

Comment · 20 days ago
Is a query planner an agent? (It might be, I'm not sure semantically the "agent" vs. "automation" distinction will aid as much in the discussion as "tool" vs. "automation", but I'm open to being completely off base here).
Comment · 20 days ago
> Give me the quick automated decision every time

Don't we already have this experience and isn't it called "the Google support experience"? And I don't know about you, but I don't like it.

Comment · 20 days ago
Via LinkedIn (ai-tool-rich-hickey-kjl8e) but I suspect that we're rate limiting slop from there. Mods, feel free to swap out the original link if I was just-wrong about that.
Comment · 23 days ago
> These systems are inherently immoral (it’s just a lot of matrix math)

(nit) "immoral" is "anti-moral". I suspect you want "amoral", that is "without" or "separated from" morals.

But, if you wanted "immoral" ... what about matrix math derived from gradient descent is inherently "immoral" in your view?

Comment · 1 month ago
Comment · 1 month ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton