supersuryaansh

Joined 2 years ago

Karma

1

Submissions

9

Member since

Sep 16

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 8 months ago

Interesting project

Comment · 11 months ago

Yes you can use a container instead https://hub.docker.com/r/holesail/holesail

Comment · 11 months ago

Hey thanks for the feedback, I am rewriting the whole documentation at the moment to make it easier to understand and cover v2 of Holesail that we recently released.

If you have a particular question about it, I am happy to help.

Show HN: Holesail – open-source peer-to-peer tunnels holesail.io

3 supersuryaansh 11 months ago 4 comments

Comment · 11 months ago

Thanks, let me know the feedback

Comment · 11 months ago

Yes it does, we have a Node API atm, but if someone wants to integrate directly as a Minecraft plugin then they would need to write Java bindings for Barejs.

Show HN: Holesail – Share localhost over peer-to-peer, no port forwarding holesail.io

1 supersuryaansh 11 months ago 6 comments

Comment · 1 year ago

I have been developing with bare for a while now, normally our app takes 45 MB to run with Node but the same app runs 10 MB lower in Bare.

For 10 instances of our app, it is easily 10x10 = 100 MB of saving with Bare.