Recent submissions

Comment · 10 months ago
I am finally building an app that will make money!
Comment · 1 year ago
Added a link in the description :) thanks
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
there will be billions of people consuming the content
Comment · 1 year ago
The assumptions is that most people that say horrible things online are cowards and would not say it in person.
Comment · 1 year ago
No to clarify I didnt say make it illegal, I said to de-anonymize it. If you are gonna say controversial things they just have to be tied to your name.
Comment · 1 year ago
Honestly I am on the edge about this, but for the sake of argument how is it evil or inhumane to de-anonymize certain types of rhetoric from digital communication. I dont think freedom of speech includes anonymity in it.
Comment · 1 year ago
yeah this is what they say but I think this argument doesnt work at scale. Singapore and China are both safer and relatively free-er than many places
Comment · 1 year ago
I used to be on your side but now that I live as a minority where the locals are increasingly becoming hostile and their very abusive rhetoric is accepted on social media and forums like reddit I actually want them to face the consequences of such speech and be deterred from uttering anything like that with their devices. (They can do so privately at the bar I have no problem with that.)

Another example is the recent nepal protests.

More abstractly I think that a multi-cultural or multi-ethnic society at scale is not able to handle anonymous and private communication without collapsing. If we dont go in the direction of benevolent censorship like China and Singapore I think the west is going to see some dark times.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton