Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
raising over a billion dollars and getting acquired for only 8 billion is terrible outcome for employees.
Comment · 1 month ago
lol no one is getting personal emails, maybe some people get one every few months, but most probably never (not taking into account other than order/shipping confirmations, login codes, etc)
Comment · 2 months ago
Will any of the data submitted be used in training? We are all given the prompt and you will get a few thousand (maybe tens of thousands of submissions). Seems like a great source of training material.
Comment · 2 months ago
This article feels emblematic of the cognitive dissonance at the heart of ant. The contrast here is hard to ignore. Their core branding is rooted in extreme AI alignment and safety. Yet in practice, their origin story and inner circle seem consistently adjacent to highly questionable actor. It's difficult to view these associations as mere accidents. At a certain point, the company you keep and the money you court reflects your actual ethical baseline, regardless of how many doomsday safety blogs you write.
Comment · 3 months ago
Anthropic is no longer a good model company in my mind, they are optimizing for an IPO and padding themselves on the back for being the next Aristotle. They're so far up their behind they don't realize how s**y their products are, and their research team hasn't done anything ground breaking in probably over a year other than release "scary" reports.
Comment · 6 months ago
Lol I've vibe coded something identical to this in a day.
Comment · 8 months ago
You still have people defending the occupation forces even when the soldiers themselves are bragging no social media about killing kids, and how they wished they killed more.
Comment · 8 months ago
this is slop
Comment · 8 months ago
In those cases the AI can spin up a shell corp and run the clinical trials, humans would administer the trials (maybe robots can do it). There is already hundreds of pharmaceutical companies so it isn’t difficult for an AI to spin up another and bring in humans when needed
Comment · 8 months ago
I feel there is an elephant in the room not being discussed. Why does he care about "diffusion of the model" within the economy? If he truly believes there will be the development of a data center of geniuses wouldn't that imply complete market capture. Who cares if pharmaceutical companies or any other business is slow to adopt the AI, the AI will capture that market entirely making those companies obsolete. An API model wouldn't even make sense in this scenario because why would you sell your model when you can capture the entire economy of the business using your model.
Comment · 9 months ago
1. You can get a great headshot using your smartphone 2. Headshots don't cost $300 (maybe on the extreme high end) 3. Gemini, ChatGPT, and nearly every multimodal model already solved this problem over a year ago.
Comment · 11 months ago
Serious question: Why exactly is this impressive? They've raised over 100 million and hired scientists who know how to do this (and collaborated with Los Alamos), what exactly is the thing that is making this go viral.
Comment · 11 months ago
To the best of your ability. If you can avoid Israeli tech then do so, if you can't at least you try. Also opensource technology is different because you can verify and audit the tech

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton