subroutine

Joined 11 years ago

Karma
3,134
Submissions
1,007
Member since
Jun 16
Computational Neuroscience PhD, UC Berkeley
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 27 days ago
What happens to the water used by data centers? Is it still clean, just warmed up?
Comment · 1 month ago
I see where you are coming from. I imagine LLMs will follow the same feedback lifecycle as other groundbreaking tech. Most legitimate iPhone 1 complaints came paired with a few positive messages to the devs and engineers. Years later, after countless improvements to the hardware and UI based on user feedback, now it's just complaints.
Comment · 1 month ago
Based on the amount of low-effort criticisms out there, clearly nobody is afraid of "big AI". Tao seems careful about his critiques of AI because low-effort off-the-cuff criticism can lead to all sorts of future problems/hypocracy.
Comment · 1 month ago
> you need to expect appropriate legals consequences for this sort of negligence

I might have missed it, but did the agents do something illegal? Or do you think that what the agents did should be considered illegal?

Comment · 2 months ago
But Claude Opus 4.6 is not really practical. Taalas' process seems targeted for edge models. Their proof of concept model, for example, is a heavily quantized version of Llama 3.1 8B and even then they acknowledge their custom 3-bit/6-bit representation causes model quality degradation.

Taalas is going to have a tough time putting a trillion-parameter model on one conventional die. Their HC1 die is already near the maximum size that conventional lithography can expose. They claim they could partition the model across many chips, but I'm not sure if they have tested this process or what it means for compute. The basic storage arithmetic is unforgiving: for a one trillion parameters model at four bits it will take 50–100 chips. To service a sizable customer base will take thousands of 100-chip fabs.

That all said, I'm bullish on this technology, and look forward to seeing it evolve.

Comment · 4 months ago
You prefer to browse amazon using a mobile web browser over the native Amazon app? Why?
Comment · 4 months ago
Why would this be more likely? The current remotes already have a Netflix button, a Hulu button, a Sling button and a Disney+ button. Roku sells dedicated buttons on their remotes to the highest bidder.
Comment · 5 months ago
Oh shit, you got me! In all seriousness, you are not doing yourself any favors if this is how you typically debate a topic. I expect more from a HN netizen.
Comment · 5 months ago
Until you look; then it collapses to one or the other.
Comment · 5 months ago
In theory, quantum computers could provide dramatic speedups for certain linear algebra operations (eg. matrix inversion, eigenvalue estimation). The catch is that many NN training algorithms need all the data to be stored in qRAM so the QC can access matrices efficiently. Loading in a massive dataset will likely be more difficult than the computations, eliminating the quantum advantage. This is analogous to having an extraordinarily fast processor attached to a slow af hard drive inside a neutrino storm.
Comment · 5 months ago
A good thing for anyone who isn't a Nazi simp or a fan of authoritarian takeovers and imperial rule.
Comment · 5 months ago
The U.S. Navy did not blockade Japan or “prevent oil being shipped” by closing the seas. The U.S. imposed an oil embargo and froze Japanese assets after Japan expanded its war in China and moved to invade other pacific countries. Surely you can understand why that was a good thing.
Comment · 5 months ago
Why would you post such nonsense given how easy it is these days to determine bullshit? By the time of Pearl Harbor, Japan was formally aligned with Nazi Germany. Japan, Germany, and Italy signed the Tripartite Pact in Sept 1940 creating the Axis alliance. Pearl Harbor happened in Dec 1941, so Japan had been formally tied to Germany for more than a year.

“The American navy closed international waters.” Not in the Pearl Harbor context. Before Pearl Harbor the U.S. was not conducting a naval blockade of Japan that closed international waters. The U.S. cut off Japan from US oil in July 1941. That is not the same thing as the U.S. Navy closing the Pacific.

“The USA blockade was the reason Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.” False. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because it wanted to neutralize the U.S. Pacific Fleet while Japan seized the "Southern Resource Area”, especially oil-rich East Indies, Malaya and other regions in the pacific. The U.S. oil embargo might have played a small factor, but that wasn't a US-only thing; various countries were increasingly unwilling to sell oil and other resources to Nazi-aligned Japan while they were attempting to conquer China and most of the Southeast Pacific.

Comment · 5 months ago
And let's also not forget that keeping wildlife, an amphibious rodent, within the city isn't legal either.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton