struppi

Joined 15 years ago

Karma
1,007
Submissions
250
Member since
Aug 8
Independent consultant since 2006. Helps his clients become better at developing high-qualty software. Java, Clojure, .NET, ... . Agile enthusiast, bonsai gardener, chili fan, amateur cook, rc car racer, climber.

Find out more about me at http://davidtanzer.net Twitter: https://twitter.com/dtanzer Email: [email protected]

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
Hi! Author of marmota here - Even though I didn't post it to YC yet: If you have any questions or feedback, reply here!
Comment · 7 years ago
Thanks.

More performant? Maybe - at least multithreading, fork/join, ... would be easier.

Smaller binaries? No, probably even larger, since the chromium embedded framework (CEF) is biiig. But it would probably be possible to add other HTML renderers later (i.e. CEF during development b/c of the excellent debugging features, JavaFX WebView later).

It would make most sense when you either need multi-threading or have existing Java libraries/code you want to re-use or have mostly Java developers...

Comment · 7 years ago
As-is, it would only work on platforms where java-cef (the chromium embedded framework) works.

But one could probably add other HTML renderers too (Android, JavaFX WebView, ...).

Comment · 7 years ago
I think the biggest difference is that I am using the chromium embedded framework (java-cef), so you get e.g. the chrome debugger for debugging your HTML/CSS/JavaScript.

My goal was to use java-cef, but hide all the weirdness.

Also, there's no pre-defined data binding, so a bit less opinionated in this case.

Comment · 8 years ago
This is exactly the reason why I usually prefer a 6-hour train ride to a 1-hour flight (at least in Germany, Austria, Switzerland).

Train: Go to the station (near city center), arrive 10 mins before train departs, get on the train, read/work/eat/drink for 6 hours, get off the train. And then you are already at the city center of your destination!

The total time spent when flying might be shorter (4.5-5 hours), but that is not worth the hassle.

Comment · 8 years ago
Yep. I almost stopped reading (but read on) after this sentence:

The coverage, all from Blue-aligned media, largely presented Mastodon as a cool new alternative to Twitter that would be free of "harassment," which is a Blue code word for the mere existence of the Red side.

This is clearly not from a neutral person. He very clearly picked a side.

Comment · 8 years ago
OK, this is now totally off-topic WRT the original blog post, but... We had a very short code of conduct at SoCraTes Austria.

Then we thought about what might happen when we have a violation (endless discussions about whether that was actually a real violation and whether our response was justified, maybe even within the team).

So, we sat down and wrote a slightly longer version, which tries to spell out some unwanted behaviour and some guidlines for conference stuff ( http://socrates-conference.at/code-of-conduct/ ).

We also wanted to explain why we have the CoC in the first place and how we'd like people to behave. It surely is not perfect (probably too long and too short at the same time).

But if you think "don't be a dick to other people" would suffice as a CoC, imagine you are the organizer of an event, and then try to list all the things that might go wrong. Be creative - I'm sure you can imagine situations where it does not suffice.

Comment · 8 years ago
They probably have personal data / personal identifiable information about you when they blocked you and still know about it... And you can ask them what data they have about you.
Comment · 8 years ago
Comment · 8 years ago
Maybe what's missing in my original comment... What I'm trying to say is that there is a certain kind of organization (mostly traditional / old organizations) who would have these kinds of problems with any agile method.

And there are other organizations who can make any agile method work for them.

So, it's not really Scrum's fault when it fails (at least not always). And it's not really (or not only) Scrum's achievement when it succeeds.

As a friend of mine, Samir Talwar, once said: "To be good at software development, you need an organization that's optimized for software development. Most organizations are optimized for something else."

Anyway, if you implement a process, but ignore even the very short (22 pages) guide that summarizes the process, but instead cherry-pick what you think will work well in your org, then don't blame the process when it does not work.

As I wrote in my book: "But changing Scrum so it works within your company will not make you more agile – It will make Scrum less agile!"

Comment · 8 years ago
Comment · 8 years ago
And probably als JavaScript.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton