stratts
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
Though for longer sessions I think DS4.1 would still come out cheaper... it's hard to beat that 98% cache discount
* The solar potential of a gloomy, northern locale like the UK is "only" half of somewhere sunny like Australia. Though I can imagine the swings between seasons are greater.
* Northern Canada has a surprising amount of potential, compared to European regions at the same latitude
It's definitely gotten worse over time as well. Looking at older README files I generated using Opus/Sonnet 4.5, its actually quite shocking how clear and concise they are. Whereas eg, Opus 5 will write paragraphs and paragraphs about random things I prompted, or a partial solution that was then scrapped for something else.
My theory is that the increasing strength in performing long-context tasks has led to this particular quirk.
"The hunting-safety effect has been substantial. The non-fatal hunting accident rate in the United States fell substantially over the decades following blaze-orange adoption, with state hunter-safety data consistently identifying the orange mandate as a major contributor to that decline."
None of the sources have any national hunting accident data - there's a single link to data from New York, and nothing that would support the claim that state data "consistently" identifies anything...
Additionally, the launcher supports a bunch existing flashcards all the way back to the original R4 which released in late 2006.
Also, it's cheap! Unsurprising given the hardware, but I picked up a couple for $10 each, compared to the $40-50 you'd pay back in the day
I did something similar for my site:
https://stratts.au/_editor/?preview=%2F&file=_site%2Fcontent...
You can edit and rebuild the site from within the browser, then download a .zip that contains everything. The editor can even edit itself.
Beyond self-modifying sites being just plain cool, there's a longevity aspect to it that I find very important as well.
There's also https://www.sparktype.org/ (a browser based CMS) which is also along similar lines.
That said, I do much prefer reading on paper, or at least on e-ink, for many of the same reasons outlined in the post. Computers and phones are just too distracting, and too dynamic.
And I'd love some way to write down shopping lists or appointments, and have them available wherever, without having to pull out the phone. Our current method is a whiteboard + a photo whenever we need it, which doesn't quite cut it.
(as a side note, it's funny to see see them promoting their native C app instead of using Java as a "shortcut". What I wouldn't give for more Java apps nowadays)
There are still consequences, however. Even with an agent, development slows, cost increases, bugs emerge at a higher rate, etc. It's still beneficial to focus on code quality instead of raw output. I don't think this is limited writing it yourself, mind - but you need to actually have an understanding of what's being generated so you can critique and improve it.
Personally, I've found the accessibility aspect to be the most beneficial. I'm not always writing more code, but I can do much more of it on my phone, just prompting the agent, which has been so freeing. I don't feel this is talked about enough!
hn (at) stratts.au