stikit
Joined 7 years ago
Karma
298
Submissions
173
Member since
Nov 30
Recent submissions
Comment · 9 days ago
Comment · 2 months ago
>>> each PR gets reviewed by more than 3 people
How does this work exactly -this is your current workflow? Which tools are you using . I assume you mean your human reviewers are using ai tools interactively and deciding which fixes the tools propose will be implemented ?
Comment · 2 months ago
what has your experience been and what are you using instead. Claude interactive agents are covered by the subscription fee so no api charges.
Comment · 2 months ago
If someone’s best practice,optimization or security check is that important, automate it. Automation is more scalable and consistent . It would make more sense to me to build purpose built agents to look for any patterns that matter. Yes, humans are needed to sanity check and design the agents and rules. Combine that with a well designed build and test harness , human code review seems to me to be obsolete.
Certificate authority (eMudhra) generated eight of its intermediate signing keys so badly that anyone can recover the private keys from the public certificates. That means anyone can mint a "valid" HTTPS certificate for any site, such as your bank, GitHub, or PyPI, and impersonate it.
Much better explanation here
https://cycle.io/blog/2026-intermediate-ca-compromise
This is the Go version of the initial HN post https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50166579