steven_noble

while I think of it, also "The Structure Of Scientific Revolutions"

"How To Make A Good Script Great", "Slow Motion: Changing Men, Changing Masculinities", "Cryptonomicon", "1984", "Lord Of The Rings"

Genuine question: is NPR always that sloppy? Because the first screen in that visual article claimed that a particular region is experiencing unprecedented growth. Which is a massive claim, given all of history, but also impossible to fact check if the authors don't even say whether they mean population growth or economic growth or something else. The second screen was even dumber. I gave up after that.

true - let's see if i can edit the post

Seems more relevant than ever given half the things we discuss on here...

"Helium production"? I'm assuming they're not running a fusion reactor...

Meanwhile, even The Economist's subeditor does not understand the difference between "who" and "whom".

Arts Degree -> Tech Journalist -> Self-Employed Self-Taught Consultant -> Professional Software Developer

Your life partner should be someone you trust and admire and who feels that way about you. Any other criterion is a recipe for disappointment.

Mechanical pencil and a day planner

The article’s headline says it’s a new technique. The article’s body does not really say this.

Also, "Man's Search for Meaning" by Viktor Frankl

"What You Can Change and What You Can't" by Martin Seligman

"Radio Birdman: Retaliate First", by Murray Engleheart. First full history of the pioneering Australian proto-punk outfit.