stefanoco

Anyone thinking of adding a feature or separate tool for exporting existing gitlab/github issues to this Ticket or Beads? Looks like in the Agentic Era having issues/tickets managed using this kind of tools and kept in folders side by side with code and documents is much more desirable than separating them to web based git servers

Very good then, and sorry for my skepticism! Indeed you’re making good use of LLM on all aspects of your professional life. I’m curious: the same applies to your hobbies and personal life? Any use of LLM that changed also those?

The author’s LinkedIn profile is also crafted by AI (and the person invented I guess). I’m asking myself if this is a joke, an experiment or a sort of a scam.

This thread is becoming huge and so searching through the comments is not easy. Nonetheless it’s my impression that little or no attention was directed to the regulatory compliance needed for vehicles to be marketed under the rules of UN (known as UN/ECE Regulations and approval scheme) and similar approaches worldwide. Which means that roughly speaking that the security and safety of the car being sold today rest assured until I don’t change (upgrade) the software governing its functionalities. It’s totally unclear how it might be possible at least in Europe to upgrade major parts of vehicles software without breaking its approval. Comments on this?

This is really at the boundaries of my comprehension of physics but it’s a remarkable achievement of Italy, Europe and international Academic institutions at large - we need them all!!!

Is it me, or the affiliations are totally missing in the cited paper?? Looks like they come from a mix of UK / US institutions

Promising. Looks like it can leverage existing requirements if included in the git repository as ReqIF exchange format files. I’m currently not able to verify with an experiment because I’m dealing with huge sets of requirements and I easily reach the limits of API (I guess), need to trim down. Any experience by others?

The point (as discussed now within interested parties) is that Technical Standards, and namely Harmonized Standards in the realm of the so called "New Approach" to products compliance, are now cited as recommended and voluntary technical measures for reaching compliance to some EU Directive or Regulation. Up to now, technical standards are discussed and published in sort-of private organizations, although sometimes funded by governments. Here the court expressed the opinion that these Harmonized Standards have somehow lawful relevance and should be freely available (not paywalled) to all EU Citizends.

There’s still very few details on the technicalities of the safety issues, anyone more informed?