staindk
Joined 5 years ago
Karma
778
Submissions
260
Member since
Nov 27
Joined 5 years ago
Edit: be sure to check Claude settings -> Capabilities -> Visuals.
A bit dark pattern-y.
Don't think I can go all-in on something like this without some way to guarantee I don't lose all my saved stuff - perhaps a way to sync to a cloud storage service, or at least an easy way to export everything manually to a file?
I am very keen to use the PT2 version. Don't need a dedicated ring.
Refused to spend more on a TV because I feel you don't get much more processing power for an increase in price. All smart TVs I've interacted with in the last 5 years have been much slower than I would consider acceptable.
Some questions are top of mind after having done POCs and trials with other companies that have products in this space (excuse me if they are answered somewhere obvious - I skimmed the site and your post before drafting this):
1. What is vendor lock-in like with Momentic? In my mind there's space for a mature QA platform that agentically generates and maintains playwright/similar tests, but perhaps I'm wrong.
1.b. will Momentic code or testing standard or some aspect be open enough that it is feasible to move away from it if needed, or continue using it if Momentic goes under/deploys major breaking changes?
2. How deterministic are Momentic tests?
3. Who is your target user? Product owner / developer / SDET / ?
----
Also - is this saying Codex is better and cheaper than Mo?
"... though Codex is a bit more precise at 86% vs 84%. The tradeoff is cost: Mo costs $2.67 per bug vs $0.80 for Codex, less than Claude Code and Devin."