spiffage

Walkability in rich countries is expensive precisely because lots of people want walkability, and that want is underserved. It's signal that we should allow more of it to happen!

Thanks for telling us about the option to use the original aspect ratio! I'd basically given up and might never have found out.

We've also shot ourselves in the foot with land-use policy in SF/Silicon Valley. When engineers build products at a company that succeeds, the gains end up accruing to landlords.

It's been de facto illegal to build more housing units for a long time. Engineers here largely either win the stock option lottery or leave (and be put to less economically efficient use) once they start a family.

Under these rules, Silicon Valley won't be Silicon Valley for much longer. Indeed, the people who speak up at city hall meetings and are the biggest activists in elections talk all the time about how much they want the tech industry to fail.

My big hope has been that when Silicon Valley cedes its mantle, it's at least to a country that's relatively friendly to western values.

Mayor Burt's not pro-housing. He's just the least anti-housing of the anti-housing majority on the city council.

Subsidies would be mostly unnecessary. Merely allowing the housing to get built would be a gigantic improvement.