spIrr

> limited by the number of activated parameters

not sure I got it?

Separately, the frontier labs are kinda pushing us into that behaviour by releasing models with ever-larger context windows.

As a hobbyist, I find it difficult to figure out how to make Claude stick with some repeating things I want it to do after every major action, like re-evaluate the completeness of tests, update the documentation, etc. And CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md definitely did NOT help there, sadly.

Yes, because accounts payable are valued at recognized revenue, and aren't being revalued at cost when written off.

Update: Seems to be an error with 5.1 Pro threads (existing and new inferences). 5.1 Thinking seems to work.

Thank you. Didn't know that and was, until now, considering paying for a Kagi subscription.

This feels like something one could easily procrastinate with (customizable, developer-friendly...).

I'm curious about how this will work on the receiving end - is that part of the infrastructure also provided by Apple or is there a common capability by 911 dispatch software to support incoming video?

When I was a financial auditor, one of the tests on revenue we did was a concentration test, since having a large portion of your revenue coming from a few customers is a risk to business continuity. Wonder how Nvidia folks are thinking of mitigations for that.

“ Does aspartame cause cancer? There’s a small chance that the answer is yes – but probably only if you consume 50 Diet Cokes every day from birth until death – and even then, we don’t have any evidence that this cancer would lead to premature death. At consumption levels equivalent to the ADIs set by the FDA and other organizations – let alone at lower, more typical intake levels – we have no more reason to suspect aspartame as a carcinogenic threat than we have for suspecting carcinogenicity from chewing with your mouth open or wearing flip-flops in wintertime.”