sozal

What I'm expecting is stop spamming here with your slops, that's all.

It is not the AI slop, it is the benchmark prepared and done by humans which people like you can't understand. You still keep posting slop comments without ZERO concrete argument.

And also, I'm not saying you said you skimmed my comments. It doesn't need to be said, it is obvious that you wrote those comments without opening the link by just reading other's comments. That's it!

Ok, even though "poorly written" is just your bias to me, at least you could provide some concrete critiques. It seems that you listened to the others, had the AI read the blog post, and asked it to write something concrete based on that.

> Or the point about "measuring cost honestly". It's not clear why you wouldn't be using the published rates and do the basic multiplication yourself. There's nothing subtle about this, and it doesn't need to a whole paragraph.

Because, while Opus provides cost in the API response, DeepSeek doesn't, but just token usage. So, cost is calculated based on used tokens for DeepSeek. We have added this section, because draft version of the post got feedback on this.

It's not too long for humans, but it seems that it's too long for you maybe because you don't know how to read :) You didn't finish it, so you assumed nobody could. Don't speak for all humans based on your own reading.

Haters like you, who skim other people's comments and pass them off as their own thoughts, are everywhere. I don't have time for it. Try you chance with other posts.

Nice try with the metaphor, but it is just useless. I'm pretty sure that you didn't event open the link, but just read the other comments, saw the word slop and wrote something to get attention. There are people like you everywhere. If you had actually read the post, you would point to a real problem in it. You can't, because you didn't read it.