sonium
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
1. I don’t care
2. It should work better since it aligns with the goal of the site
Wouldn't the transcript or at least a timeline of Apollo 11 be part of the training corpus? So even without the 400 pages in the context window just given the drawing I would assume a prompt like "In the context of Apoll 11, what moment does the drawing refer to?" would yield the same result.
1) it takes a undergrad to make and measure a superconductor but a Nobel laureate to explain it.
2) in theory if you understand the mechanism of something you can improve it. In material science however almost always all you need is a trial and error approach to end up with a good result.
Conclusion: the effect is probably true, the explanation not
edit: typo