sohex

Do people just not even search their proposed name anymore?

It is interesting to see the degree to which Claude voice creeps into normal speech. It also leads to some annoying catch-22’s, like rejecting an em-dash where you might have genuinely written one to avoid the appearance of LLM text.

Thankfully I’m lazy and have always used hyphens everywhere so at least I’m safe on that point.

Oh very nice, bliss looks pretty slick. I see musefs as being kind of an unglamorous middle man layer that ultimately just has one job, separate the metadata handling from the backing files.

Since the DB is the source of truth you can absolutely version your metadata. The portable mirror use case is definitely one that people run into, but I see musefs more enabling that than handling it directly. It’d be really easy to handle transcoding and art handling just pointing at a musefs mount or by having a plugin for whatever you’re using handle it.

I definitely agree that continuous automation is the way to go, personally I set it up differently though. Whenever I have a new album in my music folder it gets detected and then beets imports it and museFS autoscans it. That handles 99% of cases silently in the background and the other 1% are the ones I’d want surfaced to make a judgement call on anyway.

I first read this in the jargon file when I must have been… 10? 12? And it’s been stuck in my head ever since.

Sonnet, GPT-5.2, Gemini Flash, in a set of 21 games, where conclusions are drawn from the LLMs self reported reasoning.

This is like writing a paper about kids in a literal sandbox fighting over ‘territory’.

The models employed don’t indicate the actual extents of machine reasoning even as we currently recognize them. They certainly don’t have the metacognition necessary to accurately understand their own reasoning. As we’ve seen with recent papers on how LLMs do math there’s a complete disconnect between actual and reported mechanism.

“Chilling” shouldn’t be the take away here.

Is it really though? Now admittedly I’ve never worked with LexisNexis or Westlaw, but would it really be that difficult to have a tool just check if the citations actually exist?

IIIRC in terms of clients mutt (&co) will actually handle “@“ in the local part correctly.

> But the real reason I do that is just because I just like to sit in anger whenever this breaks the user experience because of programming errors or inconsistencies.

Genuinely delighted by the fact that I’m not alone in that.

Namespace collision

Well I have a new favorite website. I don’t know the last time that I read something that was so thoroughly and multidimensionally my shit.

Not actually measuring crispness when you self report having the perfect equipment to do so is a cruel, cruel tease though.

Shout out to the best named feminist group of all time, W.I.T.C.H. The Women’s International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell.

This has a serious case of in-housing the edge cases that I don’t think many would want to pay the price for.

The problem with DNS per the haiku isn’t that it’s difficult to understand, or even that running your own DNS server is particularly difficult. It’s that coordinating information and exchange at scale is a tricky problem with a lot of non-obvious edge cases and foot guns.

So trying to reduce complexity by sidestepping DNS really doesn’t do that, it just leaves you holding the bag on all the problems that DNS was quietly solving for you in the background.

My interpretation would be that he feels his wife is incredibly loving in a quantity he isn’t able to match (degree) and in a unique way he’s not able to match (kind). General life experience plus the fact that he wrote that tells me he’s probably wrong and his wife would probably say the same about him, but that’s just speculation.

I’ve had one experience with Claude Code so far that genuinely frustrated me, but it did it to such a degree that it wrapped back around to hilarity. It tried to run a command got an error, realized it needed to cd to a different directory first, and then… didn’t do that.

It tried itself several times going “oh, I didn’t actually cd, let me add that and try again”. I tried correcting it several times “you MUST begin the command with `cd dir &&`”. There were a lot of variations back and forth to try to coax out the correct tool call. Including backing up the conversation and trying from earlier in the context.

It refused. Every time. It simply would not include the cd. Genuinely unhinged behavior.

Wildly true. Purely anecdotal on my part, but in my experience the cooking stack exchange was just awful to even try to ask something on.