socrates1024

That's falsifiable though, in a way the other examples are not. You could sample the population of users after the change to the product

Why would this prove the necessity of regulations? This occurred within the realm of regulations, not in the wild west. FTX.US is a regulated entity in the US, and FTX Intl wasn't available to US customers. Doesn't this prove that calamity happens even despite the regulations

Write an M.L. Stine book is probably a good gpt-3 prompt

exponential in what?

Even more recent changes have made this better too. The research in the paper only goes up to Apr. 2017 or so. Since then, the "recent zone" has been a) reduced from 5 days to 3 days, and b) more recent zone mixins are included. We haven't quantified what improvement that makes, but it should help.

This isn't a good explanation. The result of this research is actually that even if you opted in to privacy during mid 2016 to jan 2017, you wouldn't have gotten it.

Contrary to the article, Tor is not a private non-profit. It's a publicly supported non-profit.

This is a great explanation for why theory is valuable.