Recent submissions

Comment · 3 years ago
We're trying to reclaim the word
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
> I'd love to see what this map looks like filtered for specific services.

Sure. I did something like that with our insurance data. Did a quick folium visualization. You can start from here:

https://www.dolthub.com/repositories/dolthub/hospital-prices...

A limitation of our dataset is it excludes percentage-based contracts. So those won't show up.

Anyways, if you have the hospital NPI you want, you can look up all of its dollar-amount negotiated rates in this table. You can link that to the `hospital` table, geocode however you want, and make a map of the different rates. Note, however, that the insurance data published here is kind of a mess and, I think, contains many many mistakes (originating in the source data.)

BTW, I'm not sure if this insurance-derived hospital data exists anywhere else. I believe it doesn't.

Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
Author here. The problem is checking compliance. By publishing these files, they seem compliant, but really aren't. Since the payors are the guardians of the data, it's very difficult to check that what they're posting is correct. That was the main thrust of the article.
Comment · 3 years ago
Completely agree. There are databases like this out there (All-Payer-Claims database) but they're extremely expensive (it would cost millions to get data for the entire US) and I have no idea why.
Comment · 3 years ago
Thanks. Will fix that.
Comment · 3 years ago
I'm the author. When I write articles I have to make a choice: make them readable by the public, or detailed enough to satisfy the experts. I try to strike a balance, but I can't have both.

Please take a look at the CMS Price Transparency Guide https://github.com/CMSgov/price-transparency-guide and familiarize yourself with the schema. You can also take a look at the federal ruling: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-...

The metadata you're talking about is specified in the files themselves. I've limited my search to fee-for-service (non-capitated, non-derived, non-bundled) institutional claims.

You can write to me if you have more questions. [email protected]

Comment · 3 years ago
I'm the author.

Take an example like this https://github.com/CMSgov/price-transparency-guide/discussio...

I don't know how closely you've worked with this data -- you clearly have some kind of expertise -- but how do you explain this?

The insurance companies had 18 months to talk to the CMS and ask for a better data model. If they're not able to explain how much things cost with 5 different negotiated types -- negotiated, percentage, derived, fee schedule, and capitation -- then they should have asked for another one.

The hospital and insurance rates are both fee-for-service base rates for items billed individually. If there's some nuance in interpreting how "fee for service" "dollar amount negotiated" goes, definitely write to me and let me know. I talked with experts in healthcare pricing before I published this.

You can write to me at [email protected] if you wanna hit me with more questions.

Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
This is basically what health insurance companies do. They want higher billed rates from hospitals so that they can offer better "discounts." In reality, no one pays the billed rates.
Comment · 3 years ago
This is all insurers, all US hospitals, and 70 billing codes (CMS-specified "shoppable" services).

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton