skypather

Is this a typo or total misunderstanding? In this article:, the author said "FAANG is Facebook, Apple, Amazon, "LinkedIn" (Wrong! it should be Netflix) and Google. ..." Frankly, if someone wants to give a "hiring (software developer) guide" but does not even know what FAANG is, I seriously doubt how good this guide could possibly be.

It is very nice and warm to hear your story.

Would you mind share some resources you learned about the investment?

So what is the next? A dedicated lane for "texting drivers"? Come on. People. Stop this nonsense.

When I see the title of this article, I expected to see sharks on the list. Am I mistaken?

Minor typos in the article: In using the word "Horse" to show Chinese character evolution, the "Regular" is marked from 220 AD to 907 AD. As a matter of fact, that kind of characters were almost the "standard" in Chinese before Chinese government simplified many words around 1950. Even now, the Republic of China (a.k.a. Taiwan) still recognizes the "Regular" characters as the standard. Among Chinese people in the world, it it also known as the "Traditional" characters.

I think you expose yourself a bit too much. With this information, people would know who you are. At this point, I don't think you would like your boss/colleagues know you are asking this question here.

second!

But 115-strain is not the strain mentioned in this study, isn't it? So your point of bringing up this product is??!! I meant, isn't one major point of this study is "not all probiotics are the same and finally someone found one is actually very helpful to new born babies"?

what if I can prove there is no integer solution for it? Is it still publication-worthy?

Cheer up. I am 48 and let me share one secret with you: It will get better as long as you do not give it up!

This is not a rely to the original question. I just want to express my surprise that so many people here giving comprehensive and insightful opinions to the question. I earned a lot by reading these replies. Way to go guys!