skor

OpenAI/Anthropic does not train on your data? I'm sure they do

and, give them some kind of rights - based on “intelligence”, so that the model takes the blame and not the user, I hope it can be ruled very soon that the owner/driver/company is responsible, not the model.

can you please list some of the people you worked with? I really appreciate good design and am always looking for great artists that I don’t know about yet, thanks.

Maybe I missed it but I actively looked for anyone’s insight into the “pace the frontier” along the lines of: “we’ve hit a ceiling, so don’t expect innovations soon”. Or an excuse for having other things more important to attend..

Fear is much more powerful than any other feeling, so setting that in will definitely prepare for a good rug pull in the IPO.

As for being dangerous, a computer can be dangerous if plugged in, it may be too late to pull the plug at some point yes, but that all seems like provocation.

Plausible?

I can't scroll through this site on Firefox and a recent mac, anyone else?

what do you do while agents work?

trees can be considered intelligent, trees show complex adaptive behavior that can reasonably be called a basic form of intelligence, but not a human-like intelligence,

I do get your point though and can see what you're trying to say, it is interesting indeed. There is however a detail that seems important to me, who is the driver? There is no agency is there? So its just fishing for data, so its a different type, just like trees are from us. I see them more like a very compressed "book of everything" that you can spin in "infinite" ways to get your desired outcomes. So yeah, definitely not alive, intelligent? Not like our intelligence.

if you want to discover new music, have a look at nts.live