skloubkov
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
Seems like this new protocol wouldn't work too well with offline messages, storing previous conversations etc.
Also would be easy to trace back to IP's and find origins of the messages. They should've designed a system so that messages would be hidden in echo/ping commands. That way if someone is monitoring all the messages between nodes they wouldnt be able to distinguish actual traffic.
Seems like test is focusing on something that IE optimized heavily
Here is another article: http://www.scmp.com/business/banking-finance/article/1384688...
I have switched from php long ago, but remember odd naming conventions and frequent switch of parameters.
Warn initially (few versions) and then raise exception/critical errors after. If developer isn't willing to update, chances are server isnt being updated either anyways.
Don't see why anyone would feel sorry for this guy. Would you feel bad for a robber that got caught?
College presidents act as a face of an institution, paying someone extra 100,000 could mean bringing in millions extra in donations/tuitions/fees etc. Big money attracts talent.
Mailer can setup url that is composed of random words and is unique per email.
Ex: www.tracker.com/weather-dog-city-nice.jpg could identify you + timestamp of request and bam, you have record of: valid email, address isn't blocked and that user reads emails from recipient. No proxy in a world would be able to make this request anonymous.
No idea what advantage of this is apart from google eventually offering an alternative to gmail (think of comment system being replaced on youtube)
1. Brings my browser to its knees (Firefox here)
2. Security. They seem to open themselves up to a whole lot of potential hacks (I hope their code deals with cookie jacking, csrf, sniffing, etc). While this would be a problem with closed source, this is made worse by running it in browser
3. Cheaters. How would they deal with people injecting code and creating bots?
Seems to cover more than just bitcoin, and includes the reasoning behind Assange's drive.
Highly recommend listening to the actual audio file (its linked in the article): http://wlstorage.net/file/cms/assange-schmidt.mp3
Any idea if the "mules" (from the article, the guys who get items shipped to them) would be in legal trouble?