shshhdhs

> This is scary that you can be punished for using a system, not hacking but just using it.

This is a revisionist explanation.

> Screenshots of some of their calendars, including their names and details, subsequently made their way outside the company.

They disclosed other people's internal calendars publicly. That's a clear violation of employer policy and not intended employer use.

I wonder why the investors weren't concerned. They've replaced their CEO for the second time since May.

And they let you subscribe to other services through their payment processing. And if you have a FireTV device, you can search for content across all those providers

Did that author actually copyright it though? Isn’t that a prerequisite?

I disagree with encouraging people to do this. You are not accounting for a CDN here, like the post. A website on the HN front page went down yesterday on a $5 VM.

And S3 just holds your HTML files, for super cheap. There’s no lock-in concern there. You can easily migrate to nginx in the future if you really want, but start with S3

What? The person in the example lied about two entire programming languages and couldn’t even touch them. That kind of person can destroy a team! I wouldn’t hire them either

I agree, but I think the idea is “can they deal with the unexpected or new? How fast do they grok things” Which happens all the time with these new frameworks, tools, etc

That’s great to hear! What changes did you make?

Ok. How does that change the paradigm? It’s still a use of force ...

I’m sure someone has a reason to not like this, but I actually think this is a fantastic approach. Especially when you raise the bar that high (a million) that it could fund many students. There’s just got to be a way to enforce it so the money doesn’t end up in some stadium renovation fund or executive bonus.

What was the solution here? To learn the Elliott 503 Mark II more deeply?

Yes, I do. They’re called canaries by the security teams. It’s especially useful for when you run automated tests when pushing updates in your pipeline. Scan the logs and database entries for the canaries.

Duplication does harm the owner, because Samsung needs to recoup the R&D money they spent and the thief does not. Because they stole the tech, the thief can undercut Samsung on pricing, ensuring that Samsung never can be profitable enough to recoup their R&D.