shedside

"apolitical" and the hero image is literally someone taking a swipe at "government inefficiency"

FWIW, I'd love to see a blog post or similar that would lead me through the steps to do precisely this – including the nginx config.

Minor bit of feedback: the camera framing part of the intro process wanted me to move so close to my phone (only a few inches from my face) that I could no longer comfortably read the screen. Perhaps I have a small head.

I work at AttendZen -- our product is built using Svelte, but our marketing website (currently) isn't. I'll investigate to see what may have caused a slowdown here, but it's definitely not down to Svelte.

I'm in exactly the same boat. It's such a shame that AFAIK nothing can import .fw.png files and keep them editable; I'll need to manually export everything to .psd before I eventually have to upgrade my OS.

This article seems to suggest that the Apache webserver is also vulnerable. But AIUI that’s written in C and Log4j is a library for Java that also happens to come from the Apache software foundation. Or am I wrong about that?

Neither Old Navy nor Banana Republic really exist as brands in the UK.

What kills me is that literally nothing (inc Photoshop) will import a .fw.png file and keep it editable. I know it's using some kind of proprietary extension to the PNG format, and that some gradients and textures would inevitably be Fireworks specific, but it'd still be useful to be able to open an old mockup and tinker with it.

That's horrifying. But nah, I'm using 1Blocker.

I sincerely hate these accursed things. Loathe them. Installed an ad blocker with the specific intent to rid myself of them.

AIUI, “Project Svalbard” is the name of the project to find a new home for HIBP. The actual service isn’t being renamed (yet).

It'd still be enabled prior to the original charge being made. The details in the link suggest that some charges would be exempted anyway (eg ones that don't use the new Checkout, ones over a certain threshold). So it's a question of whether or not a given individual charge is insured, not a question of whether your Stripe account as a whole is insured.

Don't know if anyone from Stripe is listening here but: it'd be amazing to be able to deploy chargeback protection selectively, as a Radar rule. So that for example we could say: charges from the US are protected (and subject to the extra fee) while charges from the UK are not.