shashankpritam
Joined 3 years ago
Karma
2
Submissions
12
Member since
Jul 12
Recent submissions
Comment · 1 year ago
This was the original link - https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/image/
Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you for saying that. When I posted that GP comment - it got immediately downvoted and I couldn't even see my comment on the thread. I kind of expected to get it tagged 'meta/off-topic' and removed.
The way I see it - corporations would like to exploit prejudices for revenue. Of course, this is not something new. But it is a societal issue and the corporate world is playing a large role in it.
For context this was the original link - https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/image/
Comment · 1 year ago
Oh, in that case, it makes sense. Also, I think men/women consume different kind of media and this is one of those "men dominated" corner of the internet. I also think due to trainig data bias - there could be some difference in quality with different subjects. So, they might be showing off their best of best.
Comment · 1 year ago
Are men not attractive? Or perhaps for Google, this blog is a targeted content? But who is it targeting? I would like to see the reasoning behind using all women images (at the least the top/first ones) to show off the model capabilities. I have noticed this trend in the image manipulation business a lot.
Comment · 2 years ago
Very promising. I know where to spend my weekends now :). It is a gem. No matter how much I ask ChatGPT it never comes up with such suggestions. So, thank you!
Comment · 2 years ago
Oh cool. I am checking this lang out. Thank you!
Comment · 2 years ago
Wow, I did not know Julia has evolved so much recently. Frankly, I am going to give it another spin! Thank you so much for your comment.
Comment · 2 years ago
I vaguely remember reading about numerical precision issues in Julia from this old blog post here - http://web.archive.org/web/20150226121144/http://wizardmac.t.... But honestly, it's from 2015, and Julia's evolved a lot since then, so it might not be an issue anymore. But I wanted to confirm, hence I added the uncertainty.