shacrw
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
And by the time Stadia improves in 2-3 years, there might be significant churn - both from gamers and developers. Like the experience might be good, but is it mindblowing?
And just today Amazon announced Luna: https://9to5google.com/2020/09/24/amazon-luna-brings-stadia-...
That Youtube integration which they talked about at launch will be interesting to see (when it comes...)
In case of Android where customizability is what people boost about, Apple's been doing a lot of good custom stuff natively.
Apple did such an amazing job with Shortcuts(yes i know it's acquired), Google just recently launched Blocks, even that's shit. Though, there are third party communities like Automate, Macrodroid, then Google comes up with half-fledged launch.
Heck, when I heard Google isn't doing a virtual I/O this year, it sent off such a weak vibe.
I mostly see it from a product+$ point of view. Stadia is the new one where I feel Google is def committed. Apart from that the old guard( 1B+ apps) is doing fine. Area 120 is just a way to kill stuff, though i think 1-2 things have been integrated in main apps.
I am divided on Google's culture of experimentation. So far it's not been impressive( long-term or short-term). Take ATAP, X Labs and now Area 120. In the beginning this (X labs, ATAP) was what I liked a lot about Google, but as a public company repeated experiments which don't turn into products is demotivating.
And their main competition is Apple. Apple ships opinions( firm product vision ) whereas Google's been shipping experiments. Facebook too in some ways.
https://twitter.com/benedictevans/status/1297115699408711681
Where's the product strategy? vision? If they wanted to study the demand and then move it Assistant eventually, then they should've launched it on the Assistant in the first place.
The mass userbase of the native app doesn't validate whether people will find the assistant experience frictionless.
Anyways, i am just spitballing (maybe this time they have a strategy!), but one thing is quite clear that they're actively destroying brand value across demographics.
I love google products so this is kind of frustrating. I've been wondering for past 2-3 years whether they even realise how brand image damage stuff like this causes?
Also, I am just a college student and I'd love to know from SV folks if you think that apart from the old Google products, their is lack of vision in new products? lack of vision in new PMs? Is Google not able to attract good talent anymore in terms of Product Strategy, Mgmt, Branding? Is it deteriorating? I've always felt that Google is terrible at perception management.
Happy to be corrected in case something above didn't make sense :)
Then, I obviously removed the space and got the login link, BUT others might get confused leading to unwanted churn ( in case they also put an extra space)
But I don't see what he has brought to the table as the CEO. I feel like Google has a lot of great engineers who've stuck around for 15-20 years, that's their core asset, but they need more direction, vision, strategy. Apple has a solid team of designers and product people who've stuck around for decades. Google needs more product people or more importantly a strong directive from the top (Pichai) to dominate in an area like hardware, AR.
Like one thing which I am especially baffled by is Google's lack of action in the AR space. Meanwhile, Apple's been ramping up small acquistions over the past 3-4 years to assemble solid talent,IP. It's going to take a lot of time for Google to catch up in AR.