sh4z
Joined 9 years ago
Karma
70
Submissions
27
Member since
Nov 30
Joined 9 years ago
If there was a result containing the whole search string it would (I believe) have been the first one.
edit: If he would have poisoned the food and the thief died, would that be ok?
I guess the point I'm trying to make is that if he did purposely contaminate the food in order to get back at the thief, instead of just talking to him about it, the talk with HR seems justified.
But how do you prove that. And even if you prove it, would it hold in court since the food was stolen?