sgrove
Joined 18 years ago
Joined 18 years ago
Some will take greater risks and win (or lose); others will play it safer and slowly accumulate wins (or be obsoleted).
Never mind the threat of letting these models write code that runs your business, or operate it agentically. Models trained by actors (corporate or nationstate) diametrically opposed to your interests.
Lots to take into account now, interesting time to be in business.
The combined use of faithful-chain-of-thought + mechanistic interpretation of LLM output to 1.) diagnose 2.) understand the source of, and 3.) steer the behavior is fascinating.
I'm very glad these folks found such a surprising outcome early on, and it lead to a useful real-world LLM debugging exercise!
Really looking forward to trying this out!
Meaning empirically, downtime seems to be tolerated by their customers up to some point?
> I feel that transforming such a wonderfully written story into a podcast with robot voices might result in a shallow and awkward rendition that doesn’t capture the essence of the original work.
I can definitely agree with that in the general sense! But I have a long commute, and I thought the content of it would still come through well enough, and I've appreciated it for a few other subjects. It's not as good as having professional voice actors read it out, but it still has some value to folks!
Better yet, if someone has already _done_ that Notebook Lm podcast and has a link to it, please share!
Definitely think this sort of idea could become the "serverless" equivalent for ml-using apps. I'm curious what you think re: versioning, consumption from various client languages, observability/monitoring/queueing, etc.? Feels like it could grow into a meaningful platform.
Although, 'script(/injection) kiddie' will be an interesting phenomenon in the future...
1. Take user task
2. Pass it to a prompt that requests a Product UI description of a component
3. Pass 1+2 to another that asks for which npm packages to use
4. Pass 1+2+3 to a templated prompt to write the code in a constrained manner
5. Run 4 in a sandbox to see if there are errors, if so pass it back to #4, looping
It’s currently quite slow, but that’s an implementation detail I think.
Thinking at https://linzumi.com
P26 YC. Reach me at sean@the thinking site above.
My hn-users must-follow list:
They're from the future:
* richhickey https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=richhickey
* brandonbloom https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=brandonbloom
They understand the future and create it:
* swannodette https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=swannodette
They're bringing the future to the masses with infinite patience:
* chenglou https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=chenglou
* sbensu https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=sbensu
* stopachka https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=stopachka
* tlrobinson https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=tlrobinson
They're just generally interesting:
* stcredzero http://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=stcredzero
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/sgrove; my proof: https://keybase.io/sgrove/sigs/wb_3GBhKpBugcFtZXC7MC8D0o7LHG1rO90aLrLDII3g ]