sema4hacker

Yes, after wandering through a few pages trying to find an example that actually did something, I gave up and moved on.

Maybe a lot of the budget is already going to a second level of workers checking the redacting workers' work.

TL,DR: A device that inputs waste heat to force pressure differences in hydrogen, outputting electricity.

Don't only names, addresses, email addresses, account/phone numbers, and illustrations need to be redacted? Couldn't an LLM do at least most of that fast and cheap?

Any time "secret" is in the title, it's not.

Seems like you already received plenty of good advice. It's time for you to move on.

I developed and shipped one product with monthly releases for decades and always simply bumped the version by one: 1, 2, 3..

Anything fancier doesn't really tell you exactly what features changed when, so a table in the documentation spelled that out for each version.

The only assistant I want is one I can interact with solely by voice. In other words, a replacement for a human secretary.

I have to believe that before starting implementation, they never put mockups in front of focus groups. Otherwise they would have immediately learned no one wanted it.

Before you read this, read "The Elements of Programming Style" by Brian Kernighan and P. J. Plauger.

Has private equity ever done anything good for anyone outside of the investors?

> I was refreshing one of our services. Part of this process was to migrate codebase from Scala 2.13 to Scala 3.

My first question was: why?

> The total payload is under 200KB.

Just out of curiosity, how big was what you considered Claude's best attempt to be?

In the 70's a Brazilian programmer told me his method was to make his best guess how long something would take, double it, then promise that amount plus-or-minus 50%.