Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
I didn't even mention mods in my (admittedly flamey) comment, I actually don't think the moderation of HN is a problem as much as the larger culture that comes with being tied to a SV finance company. But thanks for the info.
Comment · 1 year ago
No, you might even be right that I have a "victim complex", given that my country is currently being victimized by the current US administration's pointless desire for a trade war. I'm especially hot under the collar at the moment.

But I would still maintain that this site's culture reflects the Silicon Valley finance culture it came from, and it's not a pretty culture.

Comment · 1 year ago
Was anything in my comment untrue?
Comment · 1 year ago
Thanks for unflagging it Dang, I wish I could have seen it yesterday.
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
OpenAI once again trying to drive up hype by making ChatGPT seem mysterious and dangerous, and the tech press uncritically eats it up. Ars even invokes the tired cliche of ChatGPT getting us into nuclear war in this article. I don't know about redditors but I'm sure that ChatGPT could persuade a Tech Journalist, they seem as impressionable as children on anything AI-related.
Comment · 1 year ago
I'm sure that Elon isn't helping, but I've read that Tesla sales were always expected to decline due to no new car in years (outside of the Cybertruck which is seen as a gimmick) and market saturation from Tesla's continued monopoly on the American EV market. Basically everybody who wants an EV already owns a Tesla and has nothing to upgrade to.
Comment · 1 year ago
The rebranding is funny since people on TikTok also use "fugging" to evade censorship.
Comment · 1 year ago
There used to be a time, in the early days around 2018-2020, where "AI art" was something that only could have been made by an AI. Very trippy and resembling hallucinations. Sort of like dreams of a computer. I do miss that era of AI art. If you search "early ai art" on Google images there are some good examples.
Comment · 1 year ago
If Kagi made a cheaper "no AI" tier I would be happy to subscribe. AI is costly to run, so even if you don't use the AI it's priced into your subscription fee - you're paying for an expensive product you don't want or use.

e: according to Kagi's pricing page they do have a 'no AI' tier, but it limits your number of searches to 300/month. Seems like a totally arbitrary limitation, but its still better than forced AI.

Comment · 1 year ago
I agree with everything you're saying about how hard the privacy issue is, but would also like to add that the social media companies are incentivized to act like they have no idea how to implement a solution, because they want teens using their apps. The Facebook Files make it abundantly clear that social companies see teen users are their most valuable asset, since the rest of the culture tends to follow where teens go. When the social companies, who are collectively worth tens of trillions of dollars, say they don't know how to implement the law without convoluted, privacy-destroying, digital government IDs I just don't buy it.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton