sedtrader
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
I am for the legalizing of marijuana, but considering the majority of Americans live in only 9 of the states, decisions should not be made based on the "majority". Federal law based on what the majority wanted was one of the things that the framers were afraid of. 9 states should not be able to dictate what occurs in the other 41 states and vice versa. Full state rights. Again I am for the legalization marijuana, but this needs to be a state by state decision, not federal govt.
Pardon my humor, but do designated drivers exist anymore? or was that just a fad that went out of style?
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/10-health-benefits-of-i...
Some of the most reputable organizations in medicine have documented the dangers of an high sodium diet.
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/salt-and-sodium...
https://www.cdc.gov/salt/pdfs/children_sodium.pdf
There are still some people that believe that smoking doesn't cause cancer after decades of research. In the end you are free to believe as you wish. Godspeed
If I let people pay to use my phone, then I am operating a cellular company. If I let people pay to use my lawn mower, then I am operating a grass cutting company. etc... No logically this ruling makes no sense. Just upset taxi companies that want to maintain the status quo.
Its really simple, if you don't understand this, you need to question your own logic. Basically the Marijuana issue should be a state decision, not dictated by the Fed Govt. What don't you understand here?