sebkomianos

Slightly offtopic: What a cool personal website!

So, it's not the actual disaster that you don't care about but the "you have not heard about this" part of the news?

Preach, brother.

No, it's about the story itself.

If you see a news title reading "This happened there and you haven't heard about it" but you have actually heard about it, just move on.

What's the point of saying "I have actually heard about it?".

I don't know what you mean by "sensationalism" so I will only say this:

Such disasters need to be heavily reported on because that's the only way for better regulation and prevention.

Furthermore, there is things that have to be done for the town to become safe and for the people to be taken care of and compensated.

And that's about it, really.

You can't really believe that brain-damaging chemicals in the air (and soil and water) is the same thing with lightnings in a severe thunderstorm!

Thanks for the correction!

Thanks for the reply!

May I ask why "you don't care", though?

Hey, 0 people live in the water so it's fine if the oceans get poisoned, right?

You are able to consume and digest millions of tweets? You are a wonder!

I can't stop thinking about this.

A few questions:

1) Do you think that a town getting poisoned is not "special"?

2) Do you think that the 5000 people that lived on said town are out of life-threatening danger?

3) Do you think it's only said town and said 5000 people that are threatened by this?

4) Don't you think that working conditions need to be regulated in order to be safe?

5) Don't you think that this disaster could help us prevent other ones?

So the live coverage from Fox is 8 days late, right?