samdoidge

> What I do, though, is measure the actual positive impact this tech has now.

I don't think just measuring the carbon footprint is giving you an accurate measurement.

You say this could not have been pulled off by a private entity, but I would argue the Japanese train system is equal, if not better and to my knowledge is privately ran.

> If the markets are like this when there are a few hundred cases in the UK and US, what will they be like when there are tens, or hundreds of thousands of cases and major cities are in lockdown?

Investors are trying to judge the likelihood of these very events and selling / buying accordingly. Markets are based on predictions.

A nice application, but I think a screenshot from the game next to the ASCII layout would improve this article.

What is your suggestion? It is far better than Chrome from a privacy point of view, while still being useable.

IC = ?

You now flagged comment was explaining ways one could check. I was showing this explanation was redundant.

I was stating my initial interpretation from the title alone.

It should be a given that responding in a chain with the OP stating 'By crypto they mean cryptography here.' I have ascertained the 'crypto' in the title now refers to cryptography.

I did interpret this as being related to cryptocurrency, so quite possibly.

> this starts with the assumption that what people like me went through is trivial.

I did not read it as that, and don't believe that is what his statement conveys.

Shambles. It sounds like there was no load-testing.

I'm sure it is related to the fact they can report N new users to shareholders. I can't see what else explains their complete lack of dealing with obvious fake/spam accounts.

Where's the evidence?

Ideally, yes.. but it shouldn't be a condition for it.