ryansan

I always thought it was good to compress first because you can more easily avoid frequency attacks. In that way I think it's better to compress then encrypt.

EDIT: That and you get to encrypt a shorter data stream. I realize frequency attacks aren't as much of a concern these days but it's just the first thing that came to my mind.

I thought the same thing when I read that. When I was thinking of "integrity" from a security perspective (as you might in an article like this) it didn't make sense. But when I thought of it more from a pure data transfer perspective between say a browser and the application it made more sense. I don't think he's saying that it's safe from mitm attacks. (At least, I hope not....)

Make sure you read the discussions below on the validity of using ad hominem arguments to undermine witness credibility. Hard to watch/read when the witness in question is an idol of yours, but still a valid approach in the court room.

I used to live in this area several years ago. It's really quite a rough area with plenty of shootings and stray bullets to go around. These stories cropped up all the time. I remember discovering at one point that the crime in Richmond was worse than Compton. Not sure if it's still true or not.